CAD & FEA.
Modelling, drawings, structural simulation.
Parametric CAD, full GD&T technical drawings, and the FEA that justifies them, structural, fatigue, thermal, NVH. Documentation that passes a supplier’s first read and an auditor’s second.
The discipline is making the numbers honest. A FEA result is only as good as the boundary conditions and the mesh convergence behind it; a GD&T drawing is only useful if the datum scheme supports the assembly function. We write down why, not just what. The report tells you how much the answer could be wrong.
How we'll run the programme.
Capabilities
Modelling, drawing, and simulation, together.
-
Parametric CAD
Master-model approach, feature suppression logic, and fully constrained sketches. The model updates when the load case changes, with no sketch-repair rework.
-
GD&T to ASME Y14.5 / ISO 1101
Datum scheme derived from assembly function. Tolerance chains closed analytically. A drawing a supplier can quote without a phone call.
-
Structural FEA
Linear static, non-linear, and buckling analyses. Mesh convergence documented per element type. Result uncertainty quantified, not just reported.
-
Fatigue & Durability
S-N and ε-N fatigue analyses with Miner's rule and notch correction. Load spectrum defined from duty cycle, not assumed.
-
Thermal Analysis
Steady-state and transient thermal FEA, CFD-informed boundary conditions. Heat-transfer coefficients measured where literature values carry uncertainty.
-
Topology Optimisation
SIMP-based topology runs as a design space scout, not a black-box. Results interpreted and engineering-filtered before geometry extraction.
Quality metrics
What production-grade looks like.
- 100%
- First-article pass rate
- Drawings passed supplier FAI without revision
- < 2%
- FEA result uncertainty
- After mesh convergence and BC validation
- 0
- Supplier RFQ call-backs
- GD&T queries on released drawings
- ISO 1101
- Drawing standard
- ASME Y14.5 also available on request